Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2018No. 2018-0252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

*168 *314 {¶ 1} Respondent, Clyde Bennett II, of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0059910, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1992.

*315 {¶ 2} On September 26, 2007, Bennett pleaded guilty to structuring financial transactions to avoid federal reporting requirements for transfers in excess of $10,000. Consequently, we suspended his license to practice law on an interim basis on February 15, 2008. In re Bennett , 117 Ohio St.3d 1401 , 2008-Ohio-594 , 881 N.E.2d 270 . On February 4, 2010, we indefinitely suspended him from the practice of law with credit for time served for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. RohrerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Schuman.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. BennettOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. DannOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Toledo Bar Association v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Toledo Bar Assn. v. DriftmyerOhio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API