Legal Opinion

Hemstreet v. Seaside Improvement Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 14, 1988No. LUBA 87-118; CA A49015PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s dismissal of his appeal from a decision by the Seaside Improvement Commission, the governing body of the Trails End Urban Renewal District. The commission accepted respondent Hammons’ proposal rather than petitioner’s competing proposals to lease the air space over certain property owned by the district. The decision, as memorialized in the commission’s minutes, reads:

“Motion to accept Mr. Hammons’ proposal, based on further details to be agreed upon by the attorneys and Administrative Officer, and subject to the approval of the Improvement Commission;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Pendleton v. KernsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Estate of Gold v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Billington v. Polk CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sensible Transportation Options for People v. Metropolitan Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Marks v. LCDCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API