Legal Opinion

Estate of Gold v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 12, 1987No. LUBA No. 86-102, CA A44142PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*47NEWMAN, J.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s decision affirming the City of Portland’s approval of the Tenth Amendment to its Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan.1 The Portland Development Commission (PDC), which is the city’s urban renewal agency, submitted the proposed amendment to the city council. The ordinance approving the amendment includes petitioners’ property in the urban renewal area and authorizes PDC to acquire it. Petitioners make two assignments, both of which assert that, in approving the amendment, the city failed to follow quasi-judicial procedures and that LUBA erred by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Western Amusement Co., Inc. v. City of SpringfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hood River Valley Residents' Committee, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. White v. VogtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Babcock v. Sherwood School District 88JCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Hicks v. Central Point School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Dennehy v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API