Legal Opinion

Sensible Transportation Options for People v. Metropolitan Service District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 1990No. LUBA 89-030; CA A62687PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of, respondent Metropolitan Service District (Metro) cross-petitions from and the other respondents (respondents) separately cross-petition from LUBA’s remand of Metro’s “update” of its functional Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). See ORS 268.390(1) and (2). The update recommends that Washington County conduct appropriate studies and consider whether to amend its comprehensive plan to provide for the construction of a “Western Bypass” freeway corridor, part of which would be located outside the Metro urban growth boundary. Under the update, existing provisions of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Hemstreet v. Seaside Improvement CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Central Eastside Industrial Council v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Marks v. LCDCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. CENTRAL EASTSIDE INDUS. COUN. v. PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Central Eastside Industrial Council v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API