Legal Opinion

Moore v. SUPERIOR STONE COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1959No. 181PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.

In a workmen’s compensation case, which has been appealed from the Commission to the Superior Court, the judge of the Superior Court has the discretionary power to grant an appellant’s motion to remand for a rehearing on the ground of newly discovered evidence under proper circumstances. Byrd v. Lumber Co., 207 N.C. 253, 176 S.E. 572.

It is contended by the movant that where a minor or one who is non compos mentis is involved there is no statute of limitations that can be invoked by an appellee.

In the instant proceeding, the plaintiff was 18 years of age at the time of his injury on 23…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Lineberry v. Town of MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Byrd v. Gloucester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCulloh v. Catawba CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Hatchell v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Branch v. SeitzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Hall v. W. A. Davis Milling Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API