Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Duke

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 12, 1924PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The assignments of error raise but one main contention that at the time of the trial of the action the defendant’s intestate, H. J. Duke, was non compos mentis and was not represented by a guardian ad litem. H. J. Duke has died since the verdict and judgment, and the defendant, Otho H. Duke, has been appointed his administrator. The defendant administrator made a motion in the cause in the court below to set aside the judgment. The motion is based on C. S., 600, which is as follows:

“The judge shall, upon such terms as may be just, at any time within one year after notice thereof, relieve a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Albertson v. . TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Stigers v. BrentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  4. Jones-Onslow Land Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. English v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Cole v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Cole v. . WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API