Hall v. W. A. Davis Milling Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.
The principal question for decision is whether, under the facts presented, Judge Crissman had authority to grant plaintiff’s motion for a rehearing by the Industrial Commission on the grounds of newly discovered evidence. We hold that he had such authority.
In McCulloh v. Catawba College, 266 N.C. 513, 146 S.E. 2d 467, Sharp, J., speaking for the Supreme Court, said:
After an appeal from an award of the Industrial Commission has been duly docketed in the Superior Court, the judge “has the power in a proper case to order a rehearing of the proceeding by the Industrial Commission on the ground of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Byrd v. Gloucester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- McCulloh v. Catawba CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Mental HealthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968