Gamble v. Twin Cities Concrete Products
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
The question before us is whether we should extend our decision in Brooks v. A.M.F., Inc., 278 N.W.2d 310 (Minn.1979), and require automatic payment of a medical provider’s treatment expenses when an employer fails to give the medical provider notice of its right to intervene in a workers’ compensation proceeding to determine responsibility for those expenses.
The employee, Lon Gamble, was injured in a work-related accident at Twin Cities Concrete Products (Twin Cities). His doctor recommended surgery, but Twin Cities objected to the surgery on the ground that it was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meyer v. NwokediSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Brooks v. A. M. F., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Troyer v. Vertlu Management Co./Kok & Lundberg Funeral HomesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Thanh Le v. Kurt ManufacturingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Vetsch v. Schwan's Sales EnterprisesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mach v. Wells Concrete Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Gist v. Atlas Staffing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Daniel Johnson (A23-0543), Relator v. Concrete Treatments, Inc., and Technology Insurance Company, and ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- David J. Mach, Jr. v. Wells Concrete Products Co., and CCMSI, Relators, and Blue Cross Blue Shield, Operating Engineers Local 49 Health & Welfare Fund, Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Nicholas Rowe v. City of Minneapolis, Self-Insured, RelatorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.