Legal Opinion

David J. Mach, Jr. v. Wells Concrete Products Co., and CCMSI, Relators, and Blue Cross Blue Shield, Operating Engineers Local 49 Health & Welfare Fund, Intervenors.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 2015No. A14-2065Published

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-2065 Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals Gildea, C.J. David J. Mach, Jr., Respondent, vs. Wells Concrete Products Co., and CCMSI, Relators, and Filed: July 22, 2015 Office of Appellate Courts Blue Cross Blue Shield, Operating Engineers Local 49 Health & Welfare Fund, Intervenors. ________________________ Eric W. Beyer, Falsani, Balmer, Peterson, Quinn & Beyer, Duluth, Minnesota, for respondent. Janet Monson, Amy M. Mahowald, Aafedt, Forde, Gray, Monson & Hager, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relators. ________________________ SYLLABUS 1. A claim…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Hauschildt v. BeckinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API