Legal Opinion

United States v. De Fillo

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 30, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

For the second time within a year petitioner moves under 28 U.S.C. §• 2255 for the setting aside of his sentence. This motion like the previous one attempts to raise objections which should have been raised at the trial, if at all. The motion is denied.

Petitioner and a co-defendant were convicted by a jury of violations of the federal narcotics laws. Petitioner was sentenced as a second offender on June 14, 1957. The convictions were affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 2 Cir., 1958, 257 F.2d 835, certiorari denied, 1959, 359 U.S. 915, 79 S.Ct. 591, 3 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. John DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Flowers v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Alastair Kyle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. United States v. Santiago De Fillo and Viola GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  5. United States v. James BranchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. James W. McCord Jr., A/K/A Edward J. Warren A/K/A Edward J. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Charles J. Thornton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  3. State v. SelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. United States v. Andrew GirondaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  5. Torriente v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API