Legal Opinion

United States v. Santiago De Fillo and Viola Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 29, 1958No. 226, Docket 24787PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

The defendants Santiago DeFillo and Viola Gonzales appeal from a judgment of conviction upon a jury verdict of the offense of conspiring to violate the United States narcotics laws (21 U.S.C.A. §§ 173, 174; 18 U.S.C.A. § 371). The defendant DeFillo, as a second narcotics offender, received a sentence of nine years, the defendant Viola Gonzales three years.

The indictment, in substance, charged defendants with conspiring with Frank Rich and Michael Botto, named as co-conspirators but not indicted, and with others unknown, to sell narcotics. The overt acts consist primarily…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. FalconeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. United States v. FalconeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. AgueciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. People v. Van EykCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. United States v. Alex DibrizziCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. Ian WoodnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,293 United States of America v. Lewis L. ColasurdoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API