Legal Opinion

United States v. Andrew Gironda

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 16, 1960No. 26351_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Gironda was convicted, along with one Arlene Cohn, for violation of the federal narcotics laws, after a four day trial before Judge Weinfeld and a jury. We affirmed, 267 F.2d 312, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari, 361 U.S. 848, 80 S.Ct. 104, 4 L.Ed.2d 86. Gironda now seeks to have the sentence set aside, principally on the ground that at one stage in the trial his lawyer said he was not feel ing well, whereupon after a conference in the robing room the judge at his lawyer’s request ruled that he (Gironda) might have the benefit of objections made by counsel for a codefendant. This, he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Robert E. Askins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. Alastair Kyle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Hilliard Sanders v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. ShuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. United States v. VasilickDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Anthony G. Saville v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  5. Dorminey v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API