Legal Opinion

Charles J. Thornton v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 6, 1966No. 19664PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

In this ease we are asked to reconsider our doctrine1 that ordinarily a claim of illegal search and seizure may not be raised collaterally under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our prior holdings (supra, note 1) are in accord with the opinions of most of the other circuits, which have ruled that collateral review is not available, either on the law or by way of evidentiary hearing.2 However, there have been recent statements to the contrary— technically in dicta — in circuit opinions 3 based on views believed to be inherent in and required by recent Supreme Court opinions.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Houser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. White v. SwensonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1966
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Leo Anthony Digiangiemo v. Paul J. Regan, Commissioner, New York State Division of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API