Legal Opinion

Smith v. Woods

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1912No. 1858PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; W. L. Barnum, Judge. Action by William P. Woods and another against Herbei't E. Smith. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the district court of Okmulgee county, and was brought by William P. Woods and C. George Kirschbaum, as plaintiffs, against Herbert E. Smith and others. The action was to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. To the petition filed in which they averred that they were partners doing; business under the firm name and style of East Side Lumber Company of Okmulgee, state of Oklahoma, the defendant Smith filed answer, in which he pleaded:

“That he admits that the plaintiffs are a partnership and compose the firm known as the East Side Lumber Company, and, under'such fictitious…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. W. Swope & Son v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  2. Byers v. BourretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Sweeney v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Choctaw Lumber Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  5. Heegaard v. Dakota Loan & Trust Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fitch v. BraddockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Standard Sewing MacH. Co. v. New State Shirt & Overall Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Stinchcomb v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Farquharson v. WadkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Asplund v. Pearce, Porter & MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API