Legal Opinion

Ruscigno v. AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY, INC.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 2000No. B136917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Jim Ruscigno appeals from the judgment entered in favor of defendant American National Can Company, Inc., after defendant’s demurrer was sustained without leave to amend.1 Plaintiff’s suit arose out of the termination of his employment by defendant. Plaintiff alleged he was terminated because he testified unfavorably to defendant during an employee’s grievance proceeding held pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer on the ground that plaintiff’s complaint is preempted by the National Labor…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Belknap, Inc. v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grant-Burton v. Covenant Care, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Smith v. Cigna HealthPlanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Hinton v. Sigma-Aldrich Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Luke v. Collotype Labels USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Ruscigno v. AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API