Ruscigno v. AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY, INC.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
100 Cal.Rptr.2d 585 (2000)
84 Cal.App.4th 112
Jim RUSCIGNO, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Respondent.
No. B136917.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four.
October 11, 2000.
Hamrick & Evans, A. Raymond Hamrick, III, Universal City, and Raymond C. Dion, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Thelen, Reid & Priest, David L. Bacon and Remy Kessler, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent.
CHARLES S. VOGEL, P.J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Jim Ruscigno appeals from the judgment entered in favor of defendant American National Can Company, Inc., after defendant's…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Belknap, Inc. v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.