Legal Opinion

Ruscigno v. AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY, INC.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 2000No. B136917Published

1Opinion of the Court

100 Cal.Rptr.2d 585 (2000)

84 Cal.App.4th 112

Jim RUSCIGNO, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

No. B136917.

Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four.

October 11, 2000.

Hamrick & Evans, A. Raymond Hamrick, III, Universal City, and Raymond C. Dion, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Thelen, Reid & Priest, David L. Bacon and Remy Kessler, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent.

CHARLES S. VOGEL, P.J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Jim Ruscigno appeals from the judgment entered in favor of defendant American National Can Company, Inc., after defendant's…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Belknap, Inc. v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API