Legal Opinion

Grant-Burton v. Covenant Care, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 2002No. B151342PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, J.

In this wrongful termination case, the employer discharged an employee, in part because she had participated in a group discussion with other employees about the fairness of the employer’s bonus system. The trial court granted the employer’s motion for summary judgment.

We conclude that the employee had a fundamental right rooted in public policy to join in a discussion with other employees about whether they were being equitably compensated. Labor Code section 232 prohibits the discharge of employees for discussing the amount of their wages. We therefore reverse as to the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Harris v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Scheherezade Sharabianlou v. KarpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Nickell v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API