Legal Opinion
United States v. Frederick Isiah Granger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 4, 1973No. 72-2201PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
Frederick Isiah Granger appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, on counts three and four of a four-count indictment pertaining to the transfer, delivery and possession of counterfeit money in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 472 and 473. All of Granger’s arguments on appeal relate to his sole defense of entrapment. We affirm.
Granger first contends that the trial court erred in refusing to give his requested jury instruction No. 1 on entrapment. We quote the essence of the proposed instruction in the margin. 1 This requested instruction is based on what has been termed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Earl D. Greene v. United States of America, John Becker v. United States of America, Mike A. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Lloyd Stanley WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Richard RussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. NoahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Peter Wylie, United States of America v. Sheldon Perluss, United States of America v. David BachrachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Paul Ewbank, AKA "Pablo"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Kung How Fong, A/K/A Kwock Tam KwoonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Frederick Isiah GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.