United States v. Frederick Isiah Granger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION PER CURIAM:
Appellant Granger challenges the District Court’s denial of a motion for a new trial after a conviction for violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 472, 473, transfer and possession of counterfeit money. We affirm.
The conviction of appellant was affirmed by this court. 475 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 412 U.S. 929, 93 S.Ct. 2757, 37 L.Ed.2d 157 (1973). A new trial is sought because of the presence of “newly discovered” evidence. A full hearing was held by the trial court on appellant’s motion.
It is well settled that the scope of review of a denial of a motion for a new trial is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elrick Rim Co. v. Reading Tire Machinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Andrew Pitts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Hershey Mfg. Co. v. AdamowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Clifton Bert CraftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Frederick Isiah GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Edward L. StreetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- United States v. MatthewsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- United States v. Gregory Lee Harris and Larry HollinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976