Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Ewbank, AKA "Pablo"

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1973No. 73-1331PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1150TRASK, Circuit Judge:

Paul Ewbank, also known as “Pablo”, appeals from his conviction by the court, sitting without a jury, of the charge of distributing hashish oil, a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Appellant admitted that he sold two vials of hashish oil on Feburary 16, 1972, to Special Agent Robert Aiu in the presence of an informer, Kerry R. Lee, for $400. He relied upon the defense of entrapment.

In support of his theory, appellant testified concerning his association with Kerry Lee, the informer. This testimony was not disputed. Appellant met the informer in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Earl D. Greene v. United States of America, John Becker v. United States of America, Mike A. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Leonard Watson A/K/A 'Step'Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. State v. CannonHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  3. United States v. Daniel Aloysius JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. McCoy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  5. United States v. WindUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API