United States v. Kung How Fong, A/K/A Kwock Tam Kwoon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
On this appeal from a conviction on two counts involving possession of heroin, appellant urges three assignments of error, none of which we find to justify reversal.
It is argued that the government here was engaged in impermissible creative activity of the type which we condemned in Greene v. United States, 454 F.2d 783 (9th Cir. 1971) and United States v. Russell, 459 F.2d 671 (9th Cir. 1972). Those cases involved government agents whose activities supplied essential elements to the crimes, chemicals necessary to drug manufacture and components with which to make bootleg whiskey.
Here, there…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Earl D. Greene v. United States of America, John Becker v. United States of America, Mike A. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Louise Orebo and Tom Gore, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Bill Lee Cummings, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Richard RussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Frederick Isiah GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Donald Eugene Parker, United States of America v. Nicholas FaitheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Burt Steven MikkaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979