Marlenee v. Warkentin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
This is an action to renew a judgment recovered by respondent on December 28, 1936, against appellant in the sum of $14,476. The only defense pleaded is a discharge in bankruptcy.
From a judgment decreeing that “the liability of the defendant to the plaintiff, as evidenced by the said judgment, duly made and entered on December 28, 1936, as aforesaid, is a liability for a willful and malicious injury to the property of plaintiff, and further said liability has not been discharged, in whole or in part through the operation of a discharge in bankruptcy, or otherwise, and the same now remains an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Parker v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Van Denburgh v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In re D'AlessioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Brown v. TroppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lubeck v. Littlefield's Restaurant Corp. (In Re Fauchier)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Fitzgerald v. HerzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Larsen v. BeekmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Ward v. MeyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Fooshe v. SunshineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.