Legal Opinion

Marlenee v. Warkentin

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1945No. Civ. 14848PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

This is an action to renew a judgment recovered by respondent on December 28, 1936, against appellant in the sum of $14,476. The only defense pleaded is a discharge in bankruptcy.

From a judgment decreeing that “the liability of the defendant to the plaintiff, as evidenced by the said judgment, duly made and entered on December 28, 1936, as aforesaid, is a liability for a willful and malicious injury to the property of plaintiff, and further said liability has not been discharged, in whole or in part through the operation of a discharge in bankruptcy, or otherwise, and the same now remains an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Parker v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Van Denburgh v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. In re D'AlessioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  5. Brown v. TroppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lubeck v. Littlefield's Restaurant Corp. (In Re Fauchier)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Fitzgerald v. HerzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Larsen v. BeekmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Ward v. MeyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Fooshe v. SunshineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API