Legal Opinion

Larsen v. Beekmann

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1969No. Civ. 33024PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

denying his motion to recall and quash a writ of execution which plaintiff, the unpaid judgment-creditor of a judgment entered upon a stipulation for judgment, had caused to> he levied. The question presented is whether the judgment was one dischargeable in bankruptcy, or more particularly whether the stipulation upon which the judgment rests is a compromise settlement and a waiver of plaintiff’s right to -assert thereafter that the genesis of his claim for accounting is a tort not dischargeable under section 17 of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C.A. §35).

I

Plaintiff filed an action averring in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Delta Dynamics, Inc. v. AriotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Fitzgerald v. HerzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. CushingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rappenecker v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. In Re: Ronda S. Peklar, Debtor. Ronda S. Peklar v. Lloyd Ikerd, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Ellena v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Landeros v. PankeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Pardee Construction Co. v. City of CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API