Legal Opinion

Moore v. United Elkhorn Mines

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Baker: William Smith, Judge. This is a suit by C. A. Moore and L. L. Foster against the United Elkhorn Mines, a corporation, Edward E. McCoy, Trustee, W. J. Patterson, Clifford L. Tice, W. A. Pope, J. T. Donnelly, Trustee, and William Pollman. From a. decree dismissing the suit, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBride

The circuit judge filed a written opinion upon the merits of this case, and, subsequently, a supplementary opinion, which so clearly state the issues involved and the general principles of law applicable thereto that, without committing ourselves to certain expressions therein contained, we adopt it as the opinion of this court. The *344opinion in chief and the one rendered upon rehearing are as follows:

“This is a suit to quiet title to a certain reservoir, which plaintiffs claim under location and appropriation, with the permission, or a “permit,” from the State Engineer, dated December 29, 1909.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sieber v. FrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  2. Smith v. Hope Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Dodge v. MardenOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Oviatt v. Big Four Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Okanogan Wilderness League, Inc. v. Town of TwispWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hughes v. BembryOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Seaboard Oil Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Smith v. ReiglemanOregon Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API