Legal Opinion

Oviatt v. Big Four Mining Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1901PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Josephine : Hiero K. Hanna, Judge. Bill by P. H. Oviatt and others against the Big Four Mining Company and others to prevent interference with a mining ditch. From a decree dismissing the complaint, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is a suit to enjoin the diversion of water from a nonnavigable stream, and to prevent interference with a mining ditch. The transcript shows that in May, 1876, one D. C. Courtney agreed to purchase certain placer mines in Josephine County, Oregon, for the purchase price of which he gave the owners his promissory note, payable *120in two years, and received their bond for a deed of the premises ; and, having entered into possession thereof, he thereupon constructed a ditch and flume from Pickett Creek to said mines, a distance of about six and one fourth miles, and diverted and used the water…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Sieber v. FrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Richardson v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Hindman v. RizorOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Davis v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Willow CreekOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Re Determination of Water Rights of Hood River.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Pringle Falls Power Co. v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hammond v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API