Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Bembry

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1970PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff trastee in bankruptcy brought this law action for money claimed due because of the sale of a building by the bankrupts to the defendants. The court sitting without a jury found for the defendants and plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff trustee’s bankrupts are Mr. and Mrs. Notz. In 1963 Mr. Notz and his mother leased premises from the defendants for a term of 10 years with an option to renew for two additional five-year terms and with an option to purchase.

Apparently during the term of this 1963 lease, Mr. Notz constructed a building on the premises. Subsequently, Mr. Notz suggested…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. Builders' Equipment & Supplies Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Adair v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sinclair v. BurkeOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Moore v. United Elkhorn MinesOregon Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. School District No. 1, Multnomah County v. NilsenOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Pickinpaugh v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hardwick v. Dravo Equipment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lewis v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API