Legal Opinion

Parks v. Ethicon, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 2, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00989Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONNA PARKS, Case No.: 20cv989-LL-RBB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ISSUE 14 ETHICON, INC.; PRECLUSION JOHNSON & JOHNSON, 15 Defendants. [ECF No. 219] 16 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Issue 19 Preclusion [ECF No. 219 (“Motion” or “Mot.”)], Defendants’ Corrected Opposition 20 [ECF No. 223 (“Opposition” or “Oppo.”)], and Plaintiffs’ Reply [ECF No. 225 (“Reply”)]. 21 For the reasons stated below, the Motion is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API