Legal Opinion

Karen Dexter v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 30, 2013No. 12-35074PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NGUYEN, Circuit Judge:

Ten years ago, Karen Dexter first applied for social security disability insurance benefits. After benefits were denied, Dexter requested a hearing. The Social Security Administration (“SSA”) ruled her request untimely, and denied a subsequent application on the ground of res judicata, but it has never explained why it rejected Dexter’s facially valid excuse for the delay in her hearing request. Dexter then sought review in federal district court, which dismissed her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because the administrative law judge (“ALJ”)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Swarthout v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Sample v. DiecksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Laura G. v. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
  2. Mickey Puckett v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Roosevelt Williams, Jr. v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. (SS) Caraceni Francione v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. (SS) Hafer v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API