Legal Opinion

Kellett v. Clayton

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1893No. 14143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County oí San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

This appeal is from a judgment and order refusing a new trial.

The action was brought to obtain an injunction, perpetually enjoining and restraining defendants from asking, demanding, or collecting any toll for or on account of the use of the toll road of the corporate defendant as a highway, or in any way interfering with such use either by the plaintiff, his grantees, or by his or their agents, tenants or employees, or any other person using the road for the purposes or business of plaintiff’s . ranch, and for one hundred dollars damages.

Plaintiff avers that he is the owner" of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Blood v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gardella v. County of AmadorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Hayward v. MohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Dudley v. Superior Court, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Blood v. McCartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API