Legal Opinion

Dragna v. White

California Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1955No. L. A. 23738PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

— Plaintiff sued three, members of the Los Angeles Police Department seeking damages for false arrest and imprisonment. Defendants did not demur, but when the case came on for trial they objected to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action. The objection was sustained, and defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted without leave to amend. It was, of course, error to grant the motion if the complaint states a cause of action. (Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. Contractors’ State License Board, 39 Cal.2d 561, 565 [247 P.2d 913] ;…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. StrobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. AgnewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hughes v. OrebCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Cornell v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. People v. PettingillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API