Legal Opinion
Cote v. Burroughs Wellcome Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 17, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-1139PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Defendant Burroughs Wellcome Co. (“Burroughs”) moves for summary judgment in this case involving termination of plaintiff’s employment with it. Plaintiff, Susan Byrnes Cote (“Cote”) sued Burroughs alleging in three counts that Burroughs vio lated Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 207- (Supp.1982) by failing to pay Cote overtime for hours worked in excess of 40 each week (Count I); that Burroughs breached its written employment contract with plaintiff “requiring termination only for just cause” and an “implied covenant ... to deal…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Worrie v. BozeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- Keystone Aeronautics Corporation, a Corporation v. R. J. Enstrom Corporation, a Corporation v. Foundry Allied Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Columbia Nitrogen Corporation v. Royster CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bowman v. State Bank of KeysvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Carlson, David v. Arnot-Ogden Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Walker v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Amendola v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Smith v. Johnson and JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.