Legal Opinion
Dental v. City of Salem
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 15, 2004No. 02C11851; A119442PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
The City of Salem appeals an ORCP 67 B judgment that declared that it had improperly rejected three bids submitted by plaintiff for towing contracts and that ordered the city to evaluate the bids on their merits. The city assigns error to the decision to grant plaintiff declaratory and injunctive relief. We reverse.
The material facts are undisputed. Plaintiff operates three towing companies. In 2001, the city decided to enter into seven contracts in three categories of towing services, and it issued a request for proposals (RFP). The RFP set forth detailed requirements for the proposals,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Brooks v. DierkerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Recall Bennett Committee v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. City of Powers v. Coos County Airport DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Kramer v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Nyland v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State Ex Rel. City of Powers v. Coos County Airport DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005