Legal Opinion

Nyland v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 2020No. A169691PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

348 Argued and submitted August 11, reversed and remanded October 21, 2020 Terezia NYLAND and Michael Nyland, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, an Oregon municipality, Defendant-Respondent. Multnomah County Circuit Court 18CV16409; A169691

477 P3d 442

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment dismissing their declaratory judgment action. Plaintiffs own a company that is state certified as a woman-owned business. Defendant believed that plaintiffs’ certification was obtained fraudulently, began investigating them, and issued an investigative subpoena seeking information from them. Plaintiffs filed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bay River, Inc. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Brooks v. DierkerOregon Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paradigm Dental LLC v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  2. Paradigm Dental LLC v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API