Legal Opinion

Kramer v. City of Lake Oswego

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2017No. CV12100913; A156284PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment dismissing their amended complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ORS 28.010 to 28.160, relating to public access to the waters of Oswego Lake and adjoining Lakewood Bay (collectively the lake) for recreation. The complaint—brought against the City of Lake Oswego (city), the State of Oregon (state), and Lake Oswego Corporation (LOC)1—challenged a city ordinance, Resolution 12-12, that prohibits the public from entering Lakewood Bay from three city parks located adjacent to the lake, as well as a city policy…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Corvallis v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Kramer v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Kramer v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Chernaik v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API