Legal Opinion
Claim of Seely v. Phœnix Transit Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 11, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.
On January 21, 1923, the date of the accident, claimant, a resident of the State of New York, was employed as a pilot and master of the tugboat Charles P. Stafford, owned by the employer herein. Said employer is a New Jersey corporation authorized to do business in-the State of New York and whose office and principal place of business is at 30 Church street, New York city. Claimant was hired at the New York office. At times he went there for his pay and at times went to the office of the employer in New Jersey therefor. His duties consisted in the towing of barges around New York harbor and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Cleveland Terminal & Valley Railroad Co. v. Cleveland Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Gould v. Champeney & Turk, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- La Crosse Dredging Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Hall v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1936