Legal Opinion

Claim of Flinn v. Remington Rand, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.

The work of the deceased employee was extraterritorial, and the appeal raises the question of jurisdiction.

Deceased was a traveling salesman selling accounting machines, being district sales manager for the employer at Atlanta, Ga., his territory covering Georgia, part of Tennessee, part of Florida and South Carolina. He was hired by contract made at the office of the employer at Buffalo, N. Y.; his office was at Atlanta, Ga., and he resided near that city. He was paid by checks from the Buffalo office and was under the supervision and control of the sales manager at Buffalo, to which office…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Matter of Amaxis v. N.A. Vassilaros, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Matter of Hospers v. . J. Hungerford Smith CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Matter of Smith v. Aerovane Utilities Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prendergast v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Alexander v. CreelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1944
  3. Ohlhaver v. NarronCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  4. Claim of Bagdalik v. Flexlume Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  5. Claim of Roth v. A. C. Horn Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API