Superior Bedding Co. v. Erenberg
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McMURRAY, J. pro tem. *
The plaintiffs 1 have appealed from an adverse judgment rendered by the court without jury on their action for specific performance of, and declaratory relief in connection with a written agreement of March 29, 1949, between two brothers, plaintiff Victor Erenberg and defendant David Erenberg.
The agreement was entered into on the severance of a business relationship which had theretofore existed between these brothers and provided for division of corporate and other property belonging to them. Under its terms, either party might become the “buyer” or “seller”;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bohman v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Jones v. PollockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Piazzini v. JessupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- City of Los Angeles v. FiskeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Converse v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1991
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1993