Legal Opinion
Osberg v. Foot Locker, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 6, 2017No. Docket 15-3602-cvPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge:
Defendants-appellants Foot Locker, Inc. (“Foot Locker” or the “Company”) and Foot Locker Retirement Plan (together with Foot Locker, “Defendants”) appeal from a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Katherine B. Forrest, Judge). Following a two-week bench trial, the district court held that Foot Locker violated §§ 102 and 404(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) by, inter alia, failing to disclose “wear-away” caused by the Company’s introduction of a new employee pension plan — a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Sims v. BlotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Michael Faciane v. Sun Life Asuc Co. of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Leslie Nolan v. Detroit Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Frommert v. ConkrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Cunningham v. Wawa, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Pessin v. JPMorgan ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.