Legal Opinion
State v. Hapsic
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 1991No. 90-T-4483PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ford, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment denying appellant’s motion to dismiss. The stipulated facts are as follows:
“1. On February 28,1990, Appellant, DANIEL HAPSIC, was charged with the offense of No Operator’s License, a violation of Section 4507.02 of the Ohio Revised Code, by the Weathersfield Township Police.
“2. The traffic stop occurred when DANIEL HAPSIC was observed by the Weathersfield Township Police Officer driving south on State Route 46 proceeding through a red light. MR. HAPSIC was given a verbal warning regarding the red light, but upon a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MorrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Fell v. Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Townsend v. DollisonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SimmonsRavenna Municipal Court · 1960
- State v. ForemanCity of Dayton Municipal Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Total Office Prods. v. Dept. of Adm. Servs., 2007-T-0035 (9-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007