Legal Opinion

Fell v. Bureau of Motor Vehicles

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1972No. 31079PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBjReuzleR, J.

This is an appeal from the Bedford Municipal Court. Plaintiff-appellant Thomas Fell will hereinafter be referred to as “plaintiff” and the defendants-appellees Bureau of Motor Vehicles and Fred Bice, Beg-istrar, Bureau of Motor Vehicles, will hereinafter be referred to as the “defendant” or “registrar,” which may be used interchangeably.

Plaintiff petitioned the Bedford Municipal Court seeking a review of the order of the registrar suspending his license to drive by reason of his refusal to take a chemical test for an analysis of the concentration of alcohol in his blood under B. C. 4511.191.

De…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hoban v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. StarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Jennings v. MahoneySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Van Meter v. Segal-Schadel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Castellano v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Atwell v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. McIntee v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. State v. KnittelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ryan v. AndrewsOhio Court of Appeals · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API