Legal Opinion
State v. Foreman
City of Dayton Municipal Court
Decided February 2, 1978No. 77 TRD 5477PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerz, J.
The undisputed facts indicate that defendant was stopped at approximately Grand and Salem in Dayton, on May 25, 1977, at about 11:35 p. m. by Officer John Huber of the Dayton Police Department because he had a headlight out. A records check revealed that the Bureau of Motor Vehicles had attempted, at least, to suspend defendant’s license to drive, under R. C. 4509.17. He was arrested, booked, and charged with driving while under suspension, in violation of R. C. 4509.76, which provides:
“No person whose license or registration or non-resident’s operating privilege has been suspended or revoked…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fell v. Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Ryan v. AndrewsOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. SimmonsRavenna Municipal Court · 1960
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HapsicOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- City of Columbus v. HaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wilson v. DollisonGirard Municipal Court · 1979