Legal Opinion

Ratush v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 24, 1992No. 292PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

While operating a taxi owned by Alexandria Cab Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, of which he was an officer, Rakhmil Ratush was involved in a motor vehicle accident in Philadelphia on October 12, 1989. The cab was insured under a self-insurance plan issued by I.F.T., Inc. Ratush did not make a claim for first party benefits under this plan. Instead, he sought to recover such benefits from Nationwide Insurance Company, which had issued a policy of insurance providing coverage for a vehicle owned by Ratush’s wife. Nationwide denied coverage, and Ratush, therefore, filed the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Orcutt v. Erie Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Rykill v. Franklin Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Jackson v. Old Colony Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. SartnoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Brosovic v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Nationwide Assurance Co. v. EasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Powell v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. BrophyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API