Ratush v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
While operating a taxi owned by Alexandria Cab Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, of which he was an officer, Rakhmil Ratush was involved in a motor vehicle accident in Philadelphia on October 12, 1989. The cab was insured under a self-insurance plan issued by I.F.T., Inc. Ratush did not make a claim for first party benefits under this plan. Instead, he sought to recover such benefits from Nationwide Insurance Company, which had issued a policy of insurance providing coverage for a vehicle owned by Ratush’s wife. Nationwide denied coverage, and Ratush, therefore, filed the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Orcutt v. Erie Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Rykill v. Franklin Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Jackson v. Old Colony Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
3Cited by10 opinions
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. SartnoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Brosovic v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Nationwide Assurance Co. v. EasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Powell v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. BrophyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.