Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Brophy

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 16, 2010No. 09-2141PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Rose Brophy appeals the District Court’s order denying Brophy’s motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to Appellee Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. (“Nationwide”). We will affirm.1

I

The following facts, as recited by the District Court, are undisputed. Brophy is a mail carrier for the United States Postal Service. On October 15, 2001, she was returning to the post office in her standard *304mail delivery truck when she was in a collision with a vehicle driven by Mylene Sweeney. Brophy suffered serious injuries in the collision.

B…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Startzell v. City of Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Ferrer v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, H/w Patsy Dezii William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, Patsy DeziiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. SartnoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerhardt v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  2. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ISMAKOVICDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API