Legal Opinion

Pribbenow v. Meeker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1934No. 31,548PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is a proceeding for compensation by dependents of a deceased workman. They recovered in the trial court, and respondents have appealed. It is conceded that all parties were operating under the workmen’s compensation act; that the workman sustained an injury by accident on April 28, 1932, which resulted in his death May 11, 1932, and which arose out of and in the course of his employment; that claimants áre his dependents, and that his wages were such as to entitle them to the maximum award.

*326The facts giving rise to the questions here…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Purkable v. Greenland Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Murphy v. W. O. Cook Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Phœnix Indemnity Co. v. Barton Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Spencer v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Coble v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  2. Rupp v. JacobsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Lehman v. Grace Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Bittle v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Whitaker v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API