Legal Opinion

Graham v. Dean

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1945No. A-537PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander

Plaintiff’s employed defendant to haul a cotton conditioner machine by truck over the public highways from Dallas to Spade, Texas. Defendant negligently damaged the machine in unloading it at destination. The defendant held a “specialized motor carrier” permit from the Roalroad Commission authorizing him to transport farm machinery and certain other goods over the highways in certain parts of West Texas, but did not have a permit to haul gin machinery. It was unlawful for defendant to haul the machine without the permit. Vernon’s Ann. Civ. Stat., Art. 911b; Vernon’s Ann. P. C., Art. 1690. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American National Insurance Co. v. TaborTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Houston North Shore Railway Co. v. TyrrellTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. McManus v. Cash & LuckelTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Pohle v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Watkins v. MinterTexas Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Official Committee Of The Unsecured Creditors Of Color Tile, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LlpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1987
  3. Lewis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Color Tile, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. Villanueva v. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API