Legal Opinion

Cruse v. O'QUINN

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided December 30, 2008No. 14-08-00103-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROWN, Justice.

In this accelerated, interlocutory appeal, appellants Leonard A. Cruse and Cruse and Associates, P.C. (collectively, “Cruse”), appeal the trial court’s grant of appellees’ motion for partial summary judgment as to Cruse’s claims arising out of a fee-sharing agreement (“FSA”). In their motion, ap-pellees, John M. O’Quinn and John M. O’Quinn & Associates, L.L.P. (collectively, “O’Quinn”) asserted the affirmative defense that the FSA was illegal and void because Cruse was prohibited by Texas law from recovering fees under the FSA on cases that were not settled or otherwise…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SpatesTexas Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Royston, Rayzor, Vickery, & Williams, Llp v. Francisco "Frank" LopezTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Super Ventures, Inc. and Abu Tuarb Tariq v. Saiqa S. ChaudhryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Zaidi v. ShahCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Lon Smith & Associates, Inc. and A-1 Systems, Inc., D/B/A Lon Smith Roofing and Construction v. Joe Key and Stacci KeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Petroleum Workers Union of the Republic of Mexico v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API