Legal Opinion

Hinsdale Savings Bank v. New Hampshire Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 5, 1898No. 10850PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Kearny District Court. W. E. Hutchison, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDoster, C. J.

This was' an action by the New Hampshire Banking Company as a judgment creditor of the Davidson Investment Company, a corporation, to charge the Hinsdale Savings Bank with liability as a stockholder in the corporation named. The action was in the form of .a petition under the last clause of *717section 50, chapter 66, General Statutes 1897. The defendant filed an answer denying its membership as' a stockholder. The only evidence in proof of membership was the stub of a stock certificate book containing memoranda indicating that a certificate of shares of stock had been issued to the defendant.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turnbull v. PaysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Plumb v. Bank of EnterpriseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brownell v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. In Re Hull Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Lebens v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Goolsby v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Foote v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API