Legal Opinion

In Re Hull Copper Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1935No. Civil No. 3590PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a proceeding to determine who is entitled to certain distributive shares of the assets of Hull Copper Company, a corporation. The facts, with one exception, are not in dispute and may be stated as follows:

Hull Copper Company, a corporation, hereinafter called the company, was a corporation duly organized under the laws of the territory of Arizona and having many thousands of stockholders distributed over all parts of the United States. It owned a considerable amount of valuable property, and on the 22d day of September, 1922, by proper corporate action, sold all its assets of every…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keyser v. HitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Turnbull v. PaysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Finn v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Carey v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  5. Mudgett v. HorrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re the Monks Club, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. In Re Rapoport's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. STATE BY VAN RIPER v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Realty Associates v. Women's ClubOregon Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API