Legal Opinion

Foote v. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 16, 1903No. 26PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

In the court below the plaintiff in error, George T. S. Foote, a judgment creditor of the Howard State Bank, a corporation of Kansas, brought suit against Joseph Anderson, executor of Eber Anderson, an alleged holder of 135 shares of its stock, to enforce a shareholder’s double liability imposed by a statute of that state. The defense was that Eber Anderson was not a stockholder. At the conclusion of the testimony on the part of the plaintiff a compulsory nonsuit was entered, the refusal of the court to take which off is here assigned for error.

Examination of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keyser v. HitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Turnbull v. PaysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Finn v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Sigua Iron Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  5. Carey v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Remington Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Austin, Commissioner v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Welch v. GillelenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Andrew v. First Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. Vance v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API