Legal Opinion
Raymond Arciniega v. Edward R. Freeman, U. S. Marshal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1971No. 26244_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal was taken from the district court’s denial of appellant’s petition for habeas corpus. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and Rule 22 of the F.R.App.Proc. We affirm.
On November 8, 1960, appellant was sentenced to ten years imprisonment for the illegal sale of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174. He was mandatorily released from custody in September 1967 under 18 U.S.C. § 4164, with a total of 1,142 days of accumulated good time, i. e., time remaining to be served. Under the terms of his release, he was prohibited from associating with persons having criminal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Zerbst v. KidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hyser v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Rogoway v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Isaac Weber v. J. T. Willingham, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arciniega v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. CaronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- United States v. AllenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
- Douglas Plumley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Raymond Arciniega v. Edward R. Freeman, U. S. MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.